Songfacts®: You can leave comments about the song at the bottom of the page.
Lennon was asking us to imagine a place where things that divide people (religion, possessions, etc.) did not exist. He felt that would be a much better place.
This song is a strong political message that is sugarcoated in a beautiful melody. Lennon realized that the softer approach would bring the song to a wider audience, who hopefully would listen to his message.
Lennon later felt that this song should have been a Lennon/Ono collaboration. He got the idea from Yoko's book
Grapefruit, which is a book of instructions, with things like "Imagine the sky crying..." or "Imagine you're a cloud."
Some people have wondered if Lennon included a message in the video for this song as well. In the video, Lennon is dressed as a cowboy and Yoko Ono is dressed as an Indian squaw. This could be a kind of message about all cultures getting along. (thanks, Adam - Dewsbury, England, for above 2)
Lennon wrote this on a brown Steinway upright piano. In 2000, George Michael paid over $2 million for the piano that Lennon wrote this on, and then returned it to the Beatles museum in Liverpool. John's piano has since been "on tour" to various world locations promoting peace.
This song plays a role in the movie Forrest Gump. Gump (played by Tom Hanks) appears on a talk show with Lennon, talking about a place where there are "no possessions" and "no religion." It's implied that Gump gave Lennon the idea for this song.
A sidewalk mosaic spells out the word "Imagine" in a section of Central Park dedicated to Lennon. The area is called "Strawberry Fields," and is located across from Lennon's apartment where he was shot.
This was not released as a single in the UK until 1975, when it hit #6. Shortly after Lennon's death in 1980, it was re-released in the UK and hit #1. It was replaced at #1 by Lennon's "Woman," marking the first time an artist replaced himself on top of the UK charts since The Beatles followed "
She Loves You" with "
I Want To Hold Your Hand."
This is credited to The Plastic Ono Band, the name Lennon used for some of his recordings after leaving The Beatles. Ringo Starr played drums on this and Klaus Voorman played bass.
On September 21, 2001, Neil Young performed this on a benefit telethon for the victims of the terrorist attacks on America. Almost 60 million people watched the special in the US.
At a 2001 tribute special to Lennon, Yolanda Adams sang this with Billy Preston on organ. Preston played keyboards on some Beatles songs, including "Get Back."
Oasis used the piano intro on their 1996 song "Don't Look Back In Anger."
In 2002, this came in #2 in a poll by Guinness World Records as Britain's favorite single of all time. It lost to "
Bohemian Rhapsody" by Queen.
This has been covered by many bands, including Our Lady Peace, and a vastly toned down version by A Perfect Circle. Jack Johnson recorded it for the 2007 compilation Instant Karma: The Amnesty International Campaign to Save Darfur. (thanks, Jeffrey - Victoria, Canada)
This was the last song played on WABC before they switched from a top-40 format to talk radio. Based in New York City, WABC was for decades the top AM radio station in the country. They debated long and hard to decide which song should be their farewell. (thanks, Rob - Minneapolis, MN)
Some speculate that this song contains backwards messages. With a keen ear and large imagination, you can barely make out the words "people war beside me" when reversing the line "Imagine all the people." (thanks, Spencer - Los Angeles, CA)
On September 13, 1980 Elton John did a free concert in Central Park, New York and ended it with this song. This performance was three months before Lennon's untimely death and before playing the song Elton said, "This is for a dear friend of mine who doesn't live too far from here, so lets sing it loud enough for him to hear it" - Lennon lived only a few blocks from that part of Central Park. The flamboyant Elton performed the song wearing a Donald Duck outfit. (thanks, Chris - Philly, PA)
Lennon said this song is "virtually the Communist Manifesto." That's usually the last we see of the quote, but Lennon added: "even though I am not particularly a communist and I do not belong to any movement." (thanks, adam - mechanicsburg, PA)
This song returned to the Hot 100 three times in the late 2000s, thanks to cover versions by Jack Johnson (#90, 2007), David Archuleta (#36, 2008) and The Glee Cast (#67, 2009).
The Jazz musician Herbie Hancock recorded this as the centerpiece to his
Imagine Project. His version features Jeff Beck, P!nk, Seal, India.Arie, Konono N°1 and Oumou Sangaré.
According to Yoko Ono, who controls the rights to John Lennon's music, the most frequent request she gets comes from musicians who want to record this song but change the "No religion, too" lyrics - a request she has always denied.
So, does this mean you can record any song, but you need special permission to alter the lyrics? Essentially, yes. Alex Holz at the music licensing and royalty service provider
Limelight explained to us: "Artists can be afforded 'some' leeway in adapting a track to your band's style (so long as you don't alter the fundamental character of the work), though lyric changes/alterations typically require direct permission from the publisher as a derivative work. Every songwriter/publisher/song is unique and requirements vary."
Comments (279):
Dean Friedman - "Ariel"
Dean's saga began with "Ariel," a song about falling in love with a Jewish girl from New Jersey.
Songs Discussed in Movies
Bridesmaids,
Reservoir Dogs,
Willy Wonka. Just a few of the flicks where characters discuss specific songs, sometimes as a prelude to murder.
Amy Grant
The top Contemporary Christian artist of all time on song inspirations and what she learned from Johnny Carson.
Colbie Caillat
Since emerging from MySpace with her hit "Bubbly," Colbie has become a top songwriter, even crafting a hit with Taylor Swift.
Lies are best believed when you mix a little truth into them. Lennon’s mixing of truth and non truth at first appearance gives some credence to his song Imagine.
“Imagine there’s no heaven”.
Those who believe that Jesus is God are not burdened by him but liberated by him from worldly things. Jesus taught us to wipe the dust off our feet as evidence against those who would not believe the Word of God – not to harm non-believers. Lennon suggests that religion is responsible for man’s inhumane actions to his fellow man. Though this may be true of those with twisted concepts of their religion, it is not true of real Christians.
“Imagine no possessions”. You might as well imagine no food because enough of it does not spring from the Earth without our cultivating it with machinery. You also might want to imagine no roof over your head or clothes on you back. I would prefer not to imagine a world impoverished by lack of basic human sustenance. It is part of the human condition to want more - Lennon himself exemplifies this rule.
To imagine there is no heaven is more than just a void of faith, it is a void of hope. Our good wishes will never change the hearts of men. Why would it. Only God can make this transformation and if you do not believe in him then you are without hope as well as without faith.
Countries are not the cause of bloodshed; they are the result of bloodshed. The violence perpetrated goes beyond the existence of borders. It is the result of culture, fear and the lack of true moral and spiritual guidance.
This song wasn't meant to be Communist at all, it just happened to come off that way.
If you actually think about it, this song fits Anarchism a lot better. Communism still divides areas as countries. Anarchism is the complete lack of government or political system, which means only geographical areas, not politically defined areas.
Anyway, that's not what this song is about anyway. This song is just asking people to think. It seems like nobody thinks anymore, everyone just accepts their life and what they are told. Just live your life, and allow others to live theirs.
Anyway, this is a beautiful song and is just timeless the world really need's a John Lennon right now, Imagine if he were still around(no pun intended).
It's because of people who are unable to be peacefull while writing a simple comment.
It's not about the millions of people in this world working against peace, it's about the millions of others who work for peace throughout there everyday lives. "You may say im a dreamer, but im not the only one" It's real, it's wise, and it's among us.
So I ask you, are you part of the disease, or part of the cure?
The song is powerful, and if more people listened to Lennon's message the world might be just a bit more peaceful.
Try to imagine the world without Religions.. the idea of heavens (all types) comes from religions.
What if when you die, you die!! Perhaps it would serve you well to live each day as best you can.
Jimmy Barnes remembers the time he heard the news of John Lennon's death. He was doing a show in Tawoomba (Queensland, Australia) when he heard on the radio. He says that he 'was devastated...was glued to the T.V. waiting to see if he survived...it changed my life'.
Obviously John Lennon did not survive. He was dead by the time he got to the hospital despite several attempts to resusitate him. (I think I spelt that wrong).
Imagine how much more money he made from the people who thought his song was a profound statement.
Imagine a man who didn't believe any of this nonsense enough to actually live it.
Most of the things Lennon imagines getting rid of are things that most (though, of course, not all) people like. Most people want to imagine their loved ones in heaven looking down at them, for example, and wouldn't the Olympics be boring without countries? How this somewhat bizarre song became one of the "best of all times" on various lists is beyond me.
which is entirely wrong, as pointed out by shamomo.
Imagine there's no heaven
It's easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us only sky
*Religion is the opiate of the masses, Karl Marx
Imagine all the people living for today
*Marx believed religion is used to suppress the fight for a better existence in this life for the promise of paradise in the after life. This line signifies the struggle for a better life in the here and now--instead of waiting in hope for a paradise that does not exist in some amorphous after life.
Imagine there's no countries
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion too
*The abolition of hostile nation states competing for limited resources and markets that is the cause of all wars is one of the most basic tenants of Marxism (highlighting the fact that individual states such as China and Russia cannot possibly be Socialist/Communist as they fail this basic criterion.)
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace
*This means the united international working-class working as one.
You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will be as one
*"I'm not the only one" is not an abstract comment, as John Lennon donated funds to the Workers Revolutionary Party who were dedicated to revolutionary overthrow of capitalism and the unification of the international working class. They are now called the Socialist Equality Party.
Imagine no possessions
I wonder if you can
No need for greed or hunger
A brotherhood of man
Imagine all the people
Sharing all the world
*Can't get more Socialist than this. Imagine no possessions in Socialist terms mean everyone owns the means of production and all the resources of the earth. No company or individual has the right to withhold basic food stuffs and the necessities of life for his own personal enrichment. This is what is meant by "sharing all the world." Can't happen under capitalism where we are about to have a world food crisis because of futures trading in food commodities on the Chicago stock market.
BTW. Personal property is a right of every individual as is the size and type of car and home they have etc. "Each according to their own ability, each according to their own need"
You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will live as one
If you think I am exaggerating, Lennon's Power to the people is overtly revolutionary.
Glorified be the Lord of all that exists, High is He above all that evil they associate with Him.
If the Lord had so willed, He could surely have mankind one community following Islam, but they will not cease to disagree, except him on whom the Lord has bestowed His Mercy, and for that did He created them, and the Word of the Lord has been fulfilled:" Surely, I shall fill Hell with jinn and men all together.
In the meantime, all of you people saying, "this is a good song except for the religion part." Don't you realize that that is probably the biggest thing that needs to be changed? We have all these religions, Christian, Muslim, Jewish,and we have all this descrimintion!
Look at the Middle East and Al Qaeda! They hate everyone that isn't Muslim!
And the Christian bible also descriminates! It's against gays and, arguably, for slavery!
Which is not a good thing really
I HATE IT WHEN PEOPLE PUT PINK FLOYD OVER LENNON AND THE BEATLES!
this isnt good its great
s so-called artists. However, he did say it, and words have meanings. You can't just say something and then say "Oh, I didn't mean anything by that". He was asking people to do what he was not ready to do. He was asking people to give up what he himself was not ready to give up.
## GOD, FREEDOM AND SURVIVAL. COMMENTARIES ON JOHN LENNON'S "IMAGINE" ##
** Ideals, understanding and life **
This surely is one of the greatest songs of our time.
Heralded by peace activist around the globe for its captivating simplicity, the lyrics actually depict how perplexing human nature really is. Beauty and hostility interchanges in our history through the expressions of religious zeal, patriotism and the struggle to survive. Properly expressed, beauty shine through. Overtly expressed, calamity erupts.
Yet, just exactly how does the same roots produces such paradoxical fruits ? What went wrong ?
The most fundamental reason probably lie in the fact that humans seems to possess ideals as a built in feature. We need to live for something, to strive for something, and to die having done something of worth in life. The belief we have in our ideals will take us to the far end of strife and sacrifice, even when that would mean to die or to kill trying. And clearly, god, freedom, and survival, supply three of the most powerful ideals a man can aspire for in life.
Everythings fine with ideals, until one forgets that most of the times, our understanding of them are anywhere but perfect. And things deteriorate rapidly when men understand them differently and willingly strife to enforce their understanding to others.
** In God we trust . . . . . for God we kill ? **
In God alone men believe perfection and perfect bliss are attainable. Yet, as theologists and philosopher have reasoned, it is impossible to attain perfect understanding of God, and to attain perfection in God during our mortal lives here on earth. Perfection is to aspire for, they say. . . . . and attainment is beyond our effort, though certainly is not despite of our effort. And religions, have indeed shown the way, each to each people in each time and each place, and if we are wise enough, I believe, each to all people in all times and all places.
When one dwelves into the depths of Buddha, Lao Tze, Confucius, Moses, Jesus, Mohammed or Gandhi for recent example, it is simply unimaginable that they would meet and then mock and throw bombs at each other, let alone command their followers to nuke each other. Yet, precisely because the devoters forget that each religion teaches no enforcement on beliefs to others beyond their consent, wars and conflicts were precisely what happened here and there throughout history.
The unity in God simply can not produce divides. Itâ??s our imperfect understanding and actions alone that produce the divides and blinds us from the unity that binds us. And it seems to me, diversity is Godâ??s way of saying, â??unite all believers of the world !â? in the style of the Marxian version for workers. This is so apparent when one reads the sacred scriptures of the worlds religions. One would find so many overlapping essence throughout, expressed in different wordings, in different languages, and in different contexts, with the prime example being the â??Golden Ruleâ? : Love thy neighbour.
So I would say, religions are expressions, the diversity. While towards God and in God, essence and unity emerge. Meaning, we should be humble in our imperfection, in our imperfect understanding of God, in our imperfect strife towards God, and learn from our mistakes and from each other. This should apply for any open minded atheist too, since they too are destined as imperfects, with their own ideal and their imperfect understanding of it, or more precisely, of religion and the Ultimate Reality.
** â??Freedom and prosperity for our people and our nation !â? . . . . . How about the others ? **
Another ideal the world grew up with is that we should strive for what is ours, with our people and our nation among our most precious.
In schools and the media, teachers and politicians preach this line of thinking to innocent minds. In times of struggle for a counryâ??s indepence, it might have been sufficient, but for the world that we now live in, it simply is not enough.
Peoples and nations has become so interdependent, that the sole prosperity and freedom of ours can no longer serve justice to all of us. And with recent development in the crisis the planet is experiencing, the freedom and prosperity of humanity can no longer violate the freedom and prosperity of other species and the earth itself. And thus we come to the culprit of our ignorance : war and economics.
Wars served our egoes well in the past and present, while economic prosperity seems to serve our egoes better in the present. War is inherently destructive for life, yet some nation canâ??t shake of the addiction of building up military prowes, even with mutual destruction staring back at us from the future to be. On the other hand, economic progress, or to be more precise, economic growth, with so many inherent paradoxes entailing, becomes the unofficial religion of the world, carried ever forward with the fervor a staunch religious devotees would have by the professional work we carry out in society. The link in the deterioration of earthâ??s life-support systems and our economic activities grows ever clearer by the day.
While nukes can blow humanity out of existence in a single blow, economic growth sucks the life out of earth, and leaves us dying glimmering with money, and with pride of our material wealth. And yet still, we compete, wage war, and kill directly with bombs or indirectly through wrongly accumulating and using money.
We feed our fears and insecurities by saying that â??the othersâ? hates us and wants us to suffer, with the Russians a little while ago, and with Osama bin Laden recently, as the prophet of destruction. We take for granted the statement that our nation and our people must remain competitive to survive and to thrive, forgetting that in a competition, some win, and some lose, and that we can no longer afford to survive and thrive alone.
We strike and preempt, but forget to fix and to prevent. We compete and become professionals at that, but forget that in cooperation lies the harmony of life, in humanity and in the entire planet.
Life surely is worth more than killing and competing.
** To survive, to have, or to be ? **
Life entails survival. Life seeks to prolong itself, the best way it can, or any way it can.
It is very natural that each person, each family, each people, each nation wish to live on and prosper. We want enough food, enough clothes, a roof over our head, a comfortable spot to sleep on, a fulfilling and meaningful work, the warmth of relationship and time for leisure, art and spirituality . . . . in esence, to be.
Things used to be tolerable, until humanity multiplies unprecedently and compete mindlessly.
With six and a half billions of mouths to feed, bodies to clothe and cover, jobs to provide, and others eager to beat us to survival, â??to beâ? simply is not an option anymore. First and foremost, to survive, next, to have, and if we made it through and manages to remember, to be.
Yet reality wakes you up from your dream and bites you in your real life.
Money is the blood of the economy, and the economy is the life of everyone. Thus, to survive, one must earn enough of it, in ways and jobs often far from the path to be. Conditions seems to prescribe nations to follow that path, the path of economic growth. Our jobs often divides families and communities, and destroy nature, but more than anything, they destroy our soul.
To have becomes our next goal after survival, and most of the times, they become our last. Thus, we become insensitive to the needs of others, humans or not, and ignorant to the needs of the planet.
Poverty and diseases persists despite the tremendous growth in the size of our economy. Garbage, waste and pollution, literally are the by-product our world economy excrete to the air, to the water, to the soil, and to other life on earth.
We refuse to except the reality that if they deteriorate, humanity goes down the drain into the abyss. Thus we end up with the chicken and egg kind of paradox. We survive they die. They die, we die. But we must survive, and they must survive. What to do . . . . . what to do ?
** Questions . . . questions . . . questions . . . and imagination **
Maybe what John really meant for us to do on hearing his song, was not to become atheists, anarchists, hippies, or communists for that matter, since a man of Johnâ??s stature should long ago have lost the interest in the glitter of isms.
Maybe heâ??s just trying to make us question, question so hard to the point that the fantasy of our world, the waking dream we are living, the half truths we behold as ideals, will crumble, so we can start rebuilding the foundations peace should rest upon. Meanwhile, hoping time will have mercy on us in getting the job done for our posterior to build upon.
Competition and cooperation have their proper places. We just need to figure out where for each.
Religions, nation states and the economy merely are tools . . . . . means. We should never become a tool of our tools. We should never mistake the means from the end. The means should never and can never become the end.
What will be your end ? Your ideal ? Make sure itâ??s worthy of your life.
What should we have as our means ? as our tools ? Letâ??s make sure we have the right ones.
Imagination rule the world, as Napoleon and Einstein would agree.
Letâ??s all spend a little more time to imagine what our end should be, and beware of the things that blinds us from the unity that binds us.
Permalink @ Nooventures -> http://wit.110mb.com/2007-03-12-god-freedom-and-survival-commentaries-on-john-lennons-imagine/
For now Comrade Sven signing out.
The first verse he asks you to imagine "no heaven...no hell below us." He then says "imagine all the people LIVING FOR TODAY." I take this as saying that without the fear of religion and what comes after, people would go crazy living life one day at a time, never thinking about the reprocussions. The second verse he says "imagine there's no country...nothing to kill or die for, and no religion too." He then says "imagine all the people LIVING LIFE IN FEAR." I take this as saying without a country (or a creator) to fall back on, people would be fear for their lives all the time. Country and religion keeps us from fear, which is why religions and civilizations were invented in the first place. The final verse he says "imagine no possessions...no need for greed or hunger, a brotherhood of Man." He then says "imagine all the people SHARING ALL THE WORLD." This is the only verse that may have anything to do with Communism (which by the way is a great idea ON PAPER). It may deal with communism, but the overall view this verse takes is "we will have peace when we all can get along and learn to help our fellow man." The lyrics are very simple. I don't understand what the big debate could be about. He isn't defaming religion OR nationalism, but rather accentuating the reasons that we need them in the first place.
Of course who am I to speak for John Lennon, you could be 100% right, this song could just be a 'pop music paycheck'. I maintain what I believe though, and I believe this song is great...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utopian_socialism
John Lennon wasn't my favourite Beatle but this song has a POINT. Calling him hypocritical is hypocritical, etc. Just imagine. Maybe these *imaginings* are not the most realistic things in the world, but thats why we have imaginations. So we can imagine a better relationship with our fellow humans. This song has a meaning and I am not going to hesitate to prove it.
These things that set us apart are possesions and class. We can't live without them but if we could then there would be no stereotpes and prejudices.
I'm not caucasian and I live in Canada, which makes me enjoy this song more. I think John lennons songs were good, and he was a very intelligent person if you should know what I mean.
If you have ever been cast out because of differences you will know what I mean.
Well thats enough. Bye
andyway this is a great song, i love the piano
I love it
after you read this, I would also like to ask you to just "Imagine" a world like this
it really gets you thinking
"Wall of sound". Listen very good and you'll hear it on the background.
This was the first song I ever performed. My accompaniment was an acoustic guitar, which is also lovely, but I love the piano melody in the song. I have only three points to make: It's a beautiful song; John Lennon was not naive - on the contrary, he was a brilliant man, and not just musically; and this song is not anti-religion. Religion can be a beautiful thing. John Lennon was against the preversion of religion, against those who take advantage of it to further their own agendas; against those who use religion to shatter peace. Jesus was a huge hippy, after all. No one denies that religions like Christianity hold great truth and comfort - however, people will always take it too far. Utopia is when people no longer need a mythology along with their morality, when people do what is right merely because it is right, and not because they are afraid of an angry God (or even of a disappointed God). John Lennon understood that. And that is why Imagine, this beautiful, almost minimalistic song, is great.
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will BE as one"
thats the best line
I just wanted to know if anybody had any comment on what john later sang in the song God.
But an amazing song...I love it!
((( Editor's note - this is the last time I shall edit or delete this comment. This is a board about songs and facts and informative thoughts about them, not personal insult slinging and political bashing. Please respect everyone's right to an opinion without resorting to namecalling. Thank you. )))
I really dont enjoy any song from my heart if it has anything against my religion....
But still it is a great song , just by his voice and his guitar, not the lyrics....
But i respect his works...
Now then, for the record, communism is great, capitalism is great, socialism is great, and utopias are excellent, but not without a good government. Communism, in its purest form should be an anarchy -not chaotic, but relying on the goodness of mankind. the reason communism is so "bad" is because the only communistic economies have been under a dictatorship. USA's capitalism only functions because of democracy.
again, for the record, Dictators are bad, Anarchies dont work because the human race cannot function without a leader, monarchies are dictators (exept constitutional monarchies, which are... acceptible) republics dont work, empires are bad, and finally, democracies are good.
people who are quick to label, accuse, and blame others without knowing what the hell they are really saying disgust me. if you are only relying on your misjudged opinions to form unjustified arguments over how bad the good things are, than you disgust me. go ahead and compare me to hilter, you only show your incompetency to grasp ideas.
I am not a Nazi or Hitler or Stalin etc, I am tired of people using that cliche to throw mud at otherwise clean people.
::back to topic::
John Lennon created many beautiful songs in his carreer, Imagine is one of my all-time favorites.
Madonna destroyed the song and her already low popularity when she attempted to sing this song for NBC's Tsunami Relief concert.
It's not about Communism, nor is it promoting communist ideas. It's not saying, "let's toss out religion and borders" it's about thinking about the reasons of war and strife, and fixing it, and believing in peace. It has nothing to do with the most prevelant of communist principles, which often have aspects of religion and social strata (ie "borders").
It's not about action itself, it's about thinking of and solving the problem, and people coming together to have peace. Thus the title, "Imagine."
As for the song (I lied, that wasn't all I wanted to say), this song is pure song about how great life would be without all of these differences between us. I'm getting tired of people saying how unrealistic it is; of course it is impossible, I gave up faith in the human race long ago. However, the name of the song is "Imagine", if you recall. Imagine how great it would be if such a thing could come into being.
And lastly, anyone who makes the comment that John Lennon was a hypocrit because he spoke of 'no possessions' because he was multimillionaire, are not truly seeing his words for what they are. He was a Beatle who made millions of dollars doing what he loved, yes, but does that make him greedy? I think not. You would have no idea if he would or would not have given up his belongings for this utopia he imagined, and neither do I; no one will ever know.
Imagine... Because that's all pathetic mankind can ever do.
A beautiful, pure song.
p.s, to the george bush fan, i think you must have been watching far too much fox news
"and no religion too"
"...COMMUNIST!!!"
Without religion most wars wouldnt have been started, with possessions people wouldnt be homeless or go hungry, without Countries people wouldn't be divided. Some of you people just try to hard to find a deep secret meaning in such straight forward songs.
Now as for the dumbf**ked idiot who claims that this war is not brutal. Tell that to mothers whose children and husbands have died because some stupid american in a tank did not want to take the time to aim. Tell that to inocent people tourtured at abu garade and to the othe 100,000 dead Iraqies.
And also, a world without relision does not neccessarily translate into communism. I personally think that religion has been nothing but destructive to human societies. It divides people us into groups, feed them with "super" natural explanations of the world, prevent, give them something to believe in and something to be afraid of, in order to be able to control them in communities. And all in the name of "GOD". I'm teling you, if there is a god he wouldn't himself approve of "religion" the way it is practiced today. Religion promotes narrow-mindedness and prevents people from using their own cognitive abilities to fullfill their roll as human beings. Sure religion was a good way of providing blind guidance for savages three thousand years ago, since their human rationality and morality had not been matured enough for them to be able to make sensible social and personal decisions, and the only way to control them was "if you do this and that you go to hell". I would like to thing human race has evolved from that. If we leave in houses, shower every day, and have concepts such as "Laws", "Moral Codes" and "Human Rights", then we should also be able to realize that certain religous saying and acts are to be understood and not to be blindly followed. For example lying and stealing is wrong because it has a nagative affect on the life of us and others, not becuase we are going to hell because of it. Or confession has a positive psychological effect by making you face your own actions and its consequences. but insisting that god created the earth in 7 days is just rediculous and in opposition to evolution. My point is, I think people nowadays must be able to use their own judgments to see the right and wrong of everything including religion.
Anyway sorry if I went on and on about religion, I think John Lennon himself didn't look into this as much as I have. Nevertheless I admire this song simply for its capability to influence its listeners enough to pause and think about an ideal world, even if for a second.
Which is a reason I'm not too into Imagine. I think John Lennon stood for Peace and he wanted most of the things he said. But some of the lyrics, like the references to possessions for example, you could tell he was only saying coz he knew he would never have to give his up.
Oh yea, and I just heard A Perfect Circles cover of this song. I cried. They completely butchered it. They made it such a depressing song. John Lennon is probably rolling in his grave
Alexandre Medina - São Paulo - Brazil
-=The Prynce
I think that's partly the reason the song is called "Imagine." We can easily imagine a utopia like this, but actually bringing it about would be near impossible.
As for finishing 2nd to "Bohemian Rhapsody", there is a website which did an amalgam of all the end-of-millenium polls, and Imagine came out on top! Don't forget that Queen fans only ever vote for one song, whereas Beatle fans have a hole smorgasboard to choose from!
I heard Alan White of Yes played... Any feedback???
While I don't agree with communism, I often wonder what life would be like without religion, and many of the other things that has people killing each other by the millions in the name of God or some other idelistic nonsense.
There's an old saying: "For bad men to do wrong requires only the opportunity. For a good man to do wrong requires religion." In other words, when a person thinks they have the almighty God on their side they are capable of things like the Holy Crusades; the Spanish Inquistion, or 9-11.
John, I think, understood the horrible things that had been done for the sake of the so-called righteous, which might account for the incredible passion he felt for the song. Of course I don't know since I'm not John, but he did have a real love for peace and understanding adn the hope that people could some day look beyond their disagreements and love one another above worldy concerns.
Mike