Sometimes what is put in as a placeholder lyric becomes a crucial part of the song. That was the case here, as Simon used "Lie la lie" in place of a proper chorus because he couldn't find the right words. Other examples of placeholders that worked include the "I know" chorus in "
Ain't No Sunshine" and Otis Redding's whistling in "
(Sittin' On) The Dock Of The Bay."
In a 1990 interview with
SongTalk magazine, Simon said: "I thought that 'lie la lie was a failure of songwriting. I didn't have any words! Then people said it was 'lie' but I didn't really mean that. That it was a lie. But, it's not a failure of songwriting, because people like that and they put enough meaning into it, and the rest of the song has enough power and emotion, I guess, to make it go, so it's all right. But for me, every time I sing that part, I'm a little embarrassed."
Simon added that the essentially wordless chorus gave the song more of an international appeal, as it was universal.
Okay, You seem to have a personal gripe with S&G, which is fine. Have at it, but kindly don't abscond my topic to use to vent your thoughts. To stop that TANGENT topic all together, I am refraining from discussing whether or not S&G thought they were hippies.
My point was that 7th avenue in NYC is NOT an area where whores/hookers/prostitutes are/exist/etc. Never have been, ever. It doesn't follow any form of logic if you REALLY meant whores, because whores have always worked 42nd street. 42nd street is the stereotypical reference for the 1940's though 1980's that you want to use if you REALLY mean whores.
I am thinking, apparently they didn't, so they were trying to say something subliminally with obscure imagery for anybody who doesn't live in or know NYC.
It is the BUSINESS district. Any discussion that I used previously was to support my thesis that they were saying that the b-u-s-i-n-e-s-s d-i-s-t-r-i-c-t (and thereby the businesses in that locale were the whores. Meaning anybody going to work for them would be "Johns". As in, if you want sole-less automaton type work, work that doesn't fulfill what you are in life but just enough to get by, THAT is a perfect place to go, the same as you would do when you go to a whore.
I did NOT call S&G whores, I was saying they were calling the BUSINESSES, whores. Which is relevant to discussing my rationalism for their choosing the lyrics they did.
So I am not without a few certificates of knowledge and background. However, I do believe Simon may have thought of he and Garfunkle as whores, but only during their Tom & Jerry phase. When S&G were really sailing, they were neither fish nor fowl. They weren't folkies, the weren't R&R, they weren't British, they weren't any of the genres that A&R guys like to stick artists into. They were S&G, they were their own "genre" and they seemed to stay that way. However, I do believe it was Paul who lead the way.
Let me state I am not speaking with avarice. Peace, man! heh But I will represent my side firmly. First, I don't know if you were around or not during the 60's but I was, and lived in Brooklyn (which is next to Queens where they grew up) So I know what was and wasn't a hippie at the time and I know how those who were old enough, were jobless. However. to explain my position; A) you were either a "square" or you were "hip" which is to say "cool/easy going/accepting other peoples differences/etc". While there wasn't a pigeon hole large enough to express the whole hippie generation, there WAS a definitive pigeon hole for "squares"; clean cut, not interested in speaking out about rights, not interested in Rock n Roll, never experimenting with illegal drugs.
B) Were they both-feet-in "hippies"? Heck no, but as I just said, the hippies weren't a clearly defined group. Some were into archaic clothes styles. (See Austin Powers) which developed into punk which developed into goth. Some dressed simply. Some liked to dress like Indians and thereby "fringe" was in. Some wore turtle necks and chokers. Some were political activists and some didnt care what they wore.
The only common denominators with Hippies were; 1) they liked music, 2) they wanted to have sex outside of marriage and 3) they tried/used recreational drugs.
I also didn't say having a recording contract and singing folk songs (another typical hippie tag) was whoring. Working a corporate job instead of having simple "honest" work was considered whoring by that generation. However, I will give a nod that MAYBE Simon was appealing to what he thought that hippies WANTED to hear and that he was speaking FOR them. I don't know one way or the other on that and as I originally said, some of what I was saying was speculation based on facts. But I was saying what I said based on his (Simon's) words that HE was the boxer. You might THINK the the song being called "the boxer" means that the whole song is therefore about him. I freely admit this isn't a solid fact.
Now while Simon was a, mostly, clean cut dude, Garfunkel had a head of hair on him that was almost an afro. Still, Simon did sport a cheesy mustache during those years. Simon also admitted he used drugs recreationally.
My summation that they were trying to fit themselves into that generation is best summed up in Simon's own words in the first quote aat the top of the page; "...It took two or three years for people to realize that we weren't strange creatures that emerged from England but just two guys from Queens who used to sing rock'n'roll. And maybe we weren't real folkies at all! Maybe we weren't even hippies!"
This quote was Simon talking about how the hippies were rejecting them, that Simon and Garfunkel weren't "even hippies!", which apparently, he didn't like. Suggesting that Simon at least thought of himself as a hipster.
referencing the lyrics "Asking only workman's wages I go looking for a job, but I got no offers, just a "come on" from the whores on 7th avenue. I do declare there were times when I was so lonesome I took some comfort there"
At the time, 7th Ave in NYC is not where whores are, they, being typically "uptown" on the famous 42nd street (as of the 1980's, no longer but that's besides the point). 7th Avenue however is, and is still to this day, the "business district".
The 60's generation was all about not being "soulless" and doing something of "substance" or meaningful. That generation would have looked at having a job in the business section of NYC as soulless, which is how some people view whores who sell themselves for money and get nothing meaningful out of it.
Thus, I believe Simon was equating the business section to whores, that he was trying to stake his claim that he was a part of his (the hippie) generation, though he confesses that he "took some comfort there" in other words he confesses he got a job doing soulless, thankless (corporate) work. Another thing that his generation praised was full disclosure, while they didn't claim to be perfect, they appreciated when someone was honest about something that they would collectively deem as "wrong". "Honest" work would have been some type of work on a farm or in a factory that you would get only "workman's wages".
I don't think this song had anything to do with the woes of immigration but simply speaks of the hardships that the 60's generation had looking for jobs and how hard it was for them for finding their niche in life.. They sought out poorer "ragged" people because they believed there was knowledge to be learned from people who have lost all.
Thanks Paul and Art for wonderfully inspiring songs!
josphat, Mombasa, Kenya
I heard that verse at the Paul Simon tribute concert in Montreal. The performers placed it between the whores from 7th avenue verse and the Laying out my winter clothes verse.
What it if was a song for all who ever felt small and alone in the world ? Those who thought they'd be strong enough to leave their home, and find that, sometimes, they crave to go home ?
The end reminds me of the end of "hey Jude"
a bit....how haunting as the end recedes back into the acoustic coda......they were right up
there with the beatles at this point....actually,
Let it be and BOTW were quite similar.......
i love this drum
Thanks.
Email me, please, at davidcandler@hotmail.com